Legal Opinion
Granovsky v. Pfizer, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 7, 2009No. Civ. 08-2280 (WHW)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff moves to remand this action to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County. She argues that Defendant Pfizer, Inc. improperly removed it from state court in violation of the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a) and (b).
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
I. Underlying Dispute
The following is a brief summary of the underlying dispute as alleged by plaintiff: Granovsky had been employed by Pfizer in New Jersey for a number of years as an analytical chemist. She reported to and worked under the control of Pfizer management, but was…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Shamell Samuel-Bassett, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Charles E. Abels and Irene C. Abels v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Lloyd Z. Remick, Esq. v. Angel Manfredy John Manfredy Jeffrey H. Brown, Esq. Kathleen H. Klaus, Esq. D'AnconA & PflaumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Moltner v. Starbucks Coffee Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- BLOUNT v. TD BANK NADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- BROSCHART v. HUSQVARNA ABDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- DCM GROUP, INC. v. RAINADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- Doye v. BechtoldDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.