Legal Opinion
BROSCHART v. HUSQVARNA AB
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 30, 2021No. 3:20-cv-18795Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ROBERT BROSCHART, Plaintiff, V. ivi i . □ S L J HUSQVARNA AB, also known as Husqvarna Civil Action No. 20-18795 (MAS) (LHG) Professional Products, Inc., formerly known as Redmax and/or Redmax/Komatsu Zenoah MEMORANDUM OPINION America; JOHN DOES 1-5 (fictitious names, true identities unknown at this time); and ABC COMPANY 1-2 (fictitious names, true identifies unknown at this time), Defendants. SHIPP, District Judge This matter comes before the Court upon two motions. The first motion is Defendant Husqvarna AB’s…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Burtch v. Milberg Factors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Karen Malleus v. John GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. BoyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.