Legal Opinion

Winslow v. Putnam

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1902No. Docket No. 2PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Ingham; Wisner, J., presiding. Bill by N. Ira Winslow, administrator of the estate of Harriet M. Williams, deceased, against Daniel Putnam, Elizabeth Putnam, and Ernest Putnam, in aid of execution. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMooke, J.

Harriet M. Williams filed her bill in this cause in aid of execution, making Daniel Putnam, Elizabeth Putnam, his wife, and Ernest Putnam, his son, de*360fendants. Since the commencement of this suit Mrs. Williams has died. On the 20th day of May, 1898, she obtained a decree against Daniel Putnam for a deficiency in a mortgage foreclosure suit for $915.80. An execution was levied on an 80-acre parcel formerly owned by Mr. Putnam, now owned by Elizabeth Putnam, and a 40-acre parcel formerly owned by. Daniel Putnam, now owned by Ernest Putnam. The circuit judge dismissed the bill. The case is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ball v. PhenicieMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Case Manufacturing Co. v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Leppig v. BretzelMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gates v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API