Andersen v. Monforton
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶1 Appellants appeal from the grant of summary judgment to William Andersen. We affirm.
¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:
¶3 1. Whether Andersen’s deed indicates that he does not own the land adjacent to his property between the high-water and low-water lines.
¶4 2. Whether Andersen is bound by the prior quiet title decree adjudicating McCollum, LLC, as the owner of the disputed property.
*464¶5 3. Whether certain portions of Appellant’s Reply Brief should be stricken.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶6 Respondent William Andersen and Appellants Doug and Valerie McCollum are neighbors.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Wareing v. SchreckendgustMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. WeaselboyMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Joseph Russell Realty Co. v. KenneallyMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Sowerwine v. NielsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Beehive Homes v. HardingMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Ethen Revocable Trust Agreement Dated October 17, 1996 v. River Resource Outfitters, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Ash v. MerletteMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- Andersen v. MonfortonMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- Beehive Homes v. HardingMontana Supreme Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.