Legal Opinion
Daley v. Smith & Nephew Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided June 21, 2018No. Case No. 17–CV–1315–JPSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. P. Stadtmueller, U.S. District Judge
Plaintiffs bring this action under the Court's diversity jurisdiction to recover for injuries sustained as a result of failed hip replacement implants. All of their claims are premised on Wisconsin statute or common law. (Docket # 36). Presently before the Court is a motion to dismiss by Defendant DiSanto Technology Inc. ("DiSanto"). (Docket # 48). DiSanto machined the femoral neck component of Plaintiffs' hip implants pursuant to a contract with Defendant MiPro U.S. Inc. ("MiPro"). Those hip replacement implants are known as the M-COR Modular Hip System…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jeffrey Connell v. Lima CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- In Re: Pelvic Mesh Litigation, Appeal of: EthiconSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019