Legal Opinion

In Re: Pelvic Mesh Litigation, Appeal of: Ethicon

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 2019No. 652 EDA 2018Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

J-A29008-18 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 IN RE: PELVIC MESH LITIGATION : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : APPEAL OF: ETHICON, INC.AND : JOHNSON & JOHNSON : : : : : No. 652 EDA 2018 Appeal from the Order February 9, 2018 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Civil Division at No(s): No. 829 BEFORE: OTT, J., DUBOW, J., and STEVENS, P.J.E. MEMORANDUM BY OTT, J.: FILED APRIL 03, 2019 Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson (collectively “Ethicon”) 1 appeal from the order entered December 4, 2017, as amended on February 9, 2018, granting in part,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  2. BNSF Ry. Co. v. TyrrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Mendel v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Hammons, P. v. Ethicon, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. In Re Angeles Roca First Judicial District Philadelphia CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API