McCormack & Phillips v. Krim
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—In related actions, inter alia, to recover payment of legal fees and to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff in Action No. 1, McCormack & Phillips, and the defendant in Action No. 2, Ronald A. Phillips, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated February 9, 2000, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the legal malpractice counterclaims in Action No. 1, and the complaint in Action No. 2.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
It is well settled that “[t]o establish a cause of action to re*465cover damages for legal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shopsin v. Siben & Siben, Esqs.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Rau v. BorenkoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Suydam v. O'NeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Iannacone v. WeidmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Lefkowitz v. LurieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Santiago v. Fellows, Epstein & HymowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009