Legal Opinion
Suydam v. O'Neill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 10, 2000PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Nicolai, J.), dated September 21, 1999, which denied his motion for partial summary judg*550ment dismissing so much of the complaint as is based on his alleged failure to submit posttrial proposed findings of fact.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant represented the plaintiff in a matrimonial action which was conducted over a span of eight months and consisted of 16 trial sessions. The Judicial Hearing Officer directed both parties to submit…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shopsin v. Siben & Siben, Esqs.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- McCoy v. TepperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Suydam v. SuydamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Tibodeau v. AbrahamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. FarrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Scartozzi v. PotruchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Ehlinger v. Ruberti, Girvin & Ferlazzo, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Velie v. Ellis Law, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Siciliano v. Forchelli & ForchelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.