Legal Opinion
Iannacone v. Weidman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 12, 2000PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendants Keith Weidman and Marjorie Rubin, as Executrix of the Estate of Joseph Rubin, Keith Rothman, and Rubin & Rothman separately appeal, as limited by their briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kitson, J.), dated January 29, 1999, as *276denied their separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motions are granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
The plaintiffs…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Volpe v. CanfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Iannarone v. GramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Rubinberg v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- L.I.C. Commercial Corp. v. RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Won Teh Hwang v. BiermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by11 opinions
- Magnacoustics, Inc. v. Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & SoffenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Stonewell Corp. v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE CO.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Dimond v. Kazmierczuk & McGrathAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Hatfield v. HerzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Allen v. PotruchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.