Legal Opinion

People v. Roche

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 3, 1994No. 2-92-1414PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Peccarelli

Defendant, Timothy Roche, was indicted on one count of reckless homicide (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 9 — 3(a) (now 720 ILCS 5/9 — 3(a) (West 1992))). After the State had presented the bulk of its evidence at trial, the trial court declared a mistrial. The State proceeded to reprosecute defendant for the same offense. Defendant now appeals the trial court’s refusal to dismiss the indictment on double jeopardy grounds. Defendant claims that the mistrial was not the result of manifest necessity and that the trial court granted it without defendant’s consent.

On July 22, 1990,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. SegovianoIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People Ex Rel. City of Chicago v. HollinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. People v. BagleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. People v. LongoriaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. People v. BagleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API