Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. City of Chicago v. Hollins
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 22, 2006No. 1—05—0655, 1—05—0656 consPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
This is a consolidated, interlocutory appeal. Respondents, Dwain J. Kyles and Calvin Hollins, Jr., appeal from orders of the circuit court of Cook County denying their separate motions to dismiss an indirect criminal contempt proceeding brought by petitioner, The City of Chicago (City), on the grounds of double jeopardy, pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 604(f). 188 Ill. 2d R. 604(f). On appeal, respondents contend that double jeopardy bars the City’s action for violations of the City of Chicago municipal building code where the City deliberately caused a mistrial. Hollins argues…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Raintree Homes, Inc. v. Village of Long GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Shulte v. FlowersAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- People v. GriffithAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- People ex rel. City of Chicago v. Le Mirage, IncIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. Le Mirage, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- People Ex Rel. City of Chicago v. Le Mirage, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.