Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Poplett

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 24, 1981No. 16785, 16786 consPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills

This will contest raises a question of “clergyman’s privilege.”

A jury determined that the will executed December 29, 1976, is the valid last will and testament of Ruth B. Reynolds, and plaintiffs now appeal, claiming evidentiary rulings by the trial court deprived them of a fair trial.

The complaint alleges that Ruth B. Reynolds lacked the mental capacity to make a will and that undue influence was exerted by James Yoder, the attorney who prepared the will in question. After certain life estates, the residue of decedent’s estate is bequeathed: one-third to Northwestern University; one-third to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State v. KurtzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. People v. PecoraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  4. Buuck v. KruckebergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Gregory v. RicheyIllinois Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lowe v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Lebrecht v. TuliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Brunton v. KrugerIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
  4. People v. BoleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Scott v. HammockUtah Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API