Scott v. Hammock
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Associate Chief Justice:
The United States District Court for the District of Utah certified to this Court the following question of law: “Whether non-penitential communications between a lay person and a clergyman are privileged under Utah law.” We accepted the certification pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 78-2-2(1) (1992 & Supp.1993). We hold that nonpeni-tential communications are privileged under Utah law if they are intended to be confidential and are made for the purpose of seeking spiritual counseling, guidance, or advice from a cleric acting in his or her professional role and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Angleton v. AngletonIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- Berry v. MoenchUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- Carolyn Mullen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- In Re Estate of SoederOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
- Griffin v. CoughlinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- State v. MacKinnonMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Doe v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.