Legal Opinion
Polaris International Metals Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided September 27, 1982No. 15830PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GORDON, Vice Chief Justice:
Polaris International Metals Corporation [Polaris] and James Concannon, President of Polaris, filed a declaratory judgment action against appellees. The purpose of the action was to: (1) void the Arizona Corporation Commission’s [the Commission] Cease and Desist Order with Docket No. S-1343-I issued March 26, 1971; (2) hold A.R.S. § 44-1841 unconstitutional to the extent it applies to interstate commerce; (3) rule that Polaris’ stock sales from January 1, 1973 to the time the complaint was filed were within the exemptions of A.R.S. § 44-1844; and (4) find the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,017 Securities and Exchange Commission, and Cross-Appellant v. Brigadoon Scotch Distributing Co., and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Selective Life Insurance v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc. v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Manning v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Shelby School v. Arizona State Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Southern Union Co. v. Southwest Gas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. GoodrichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Southern Union Co. v. Southwest Gas Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Chrysler Capital Corp. v. Century Power Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.