Legal Opinion
Lynn v. Biderman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 24, 1976No. 75-1617PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BROWNING and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON,* District Judge. BRUCE R. THOMPSON, District Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of the district court (a) enforcing the subpoena duces tecum issued by Petitioner-Appellee (“Appellee”) in the course of an investigation under the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1701 et seq.; and (b) dismissing the counterclaim for declaratory and injunctive relief filed by Respondents-Appellants (“Appellants”).
The Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (“Act”) requires persons1 engaged in certain interstate sales…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Burlington Northern R. Co. v. Office of Inspector General, R.R. Retirement Bd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Merrill KarlenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Pierce v. Apple Valley, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Elmer B. Staats, Comptroller General of the United States, and United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Francis v. AccardoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.