Legal Opinion

Geraty v. Druiding

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 1, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Kirk Hawes, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.

This appeal might properly be dismissed for a failure by appellant to file a proper abstract or abridgment of the record as required by Rule 21 of this court. C. & G. T. Ry. Co. v. Crolie, 33 Ill. App. 17; Gilbert v. Coons, 37 Ill. App. 448.

"What purports to be an abstract of the record is in fact a mere index.

Forty-nine words, more than one-half of which are formal, comprise all the information afforded by the so-called abstract as to what is contained in a bill in equity consisting, as shown by the marginal references, of nine pages, and eight words in another place purport to state the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Colson v. LeitchIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Gilbert v. CoonsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  3. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. CrolieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Booth v. KoehlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  2. Off v. Title G., A. & T. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  3. Tolman v. DreyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  4. Lasher v. AnnunziataAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
  5. Marthaler v. DruidingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API