Legal Opinion

Marthaler v. Druiding

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 12, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Debt-.—-In the Superior Court of Cook County, on appeal from a justice of the peace; the Hon. Jonas Hutchinson, Judge, presiding. Trial by the court; finding for plaintiff; appeal by defendant. Heard in this court at the October term, 1894, and affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

June 25, 1891, Druiding recovered before a justice a judgment for $120 and costs against one Gerarty, who, instead of appealing while there was yet time, obtained an injunction to restrain the collection of the judgment, and gave a bond with the appellant as surety. That case is reported in 44 Ill. App. 440. The bond was not conditioned, as Sec. 8, Ch. 69, “ Injunctions,”' requires, to pay the judgment, but only to pay such costs and damages as should be awarded.

The appellant is a surety and only bound by the letter of the bond; but when sued upon it, he must make his defense in such manner…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Geraty v. DruidingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  3. Nichols v. OttoIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. GibsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  2. Ætna Iron Works v. OwenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API