Legal Opinion

HAGEMAN AND POND, INC. v. Clark

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1951No. 2496PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Blume, Justice.

This is an action brought by the plaintiffs against the defendant Bill Clark to recover damages in the sum of FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($50,000.00) from the defendant on account of the failure of defendant to drill an oil well. A demurrer was filed to the petition on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The trial court sustained the demurrer and plaintiffs not pleading further, judgment was entered in favor of the defendant. From that judgment the plaintiffs have brought this case to this court by petition in error. Parties…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mississippi & Dominion Steamship Co. v. SwiftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
  2. Atlantic Coast Realty Co. v. Robertson'sSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  3. Denver Joint Stock Land Bank of Denver v. DixonWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Summers v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Gilbert v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Torgeson v. ConnellyWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Davis v. DavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Oregon Basin Oil and Gas Company v. Ohio Oil CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Simek v. TateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API