Legal Opinion

People v. Pearch

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1991No. D010962PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KREMER, P. J.

Edward Francis Pearch and Jonathan Darrell Strawn appeal their convictions by a jury of second degree felony murder with a firearm (Pen. Code, §§ 187, 12022, subd. (a)) based on a killing during a kidnapping. On appeal, Pearch and Strawn contend the judgment must be reversed because the court erroneously admitted a hearsay statement by the victim, the court should have instructed on when a kidnapping ends and because simple kidnapping cannot serve as the basis for a second degree felony murder conviction. Strawn also contends the prosecutor committed misconduct during his…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. HinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. GreenbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. People v. GastonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API