Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Land Co. v. Kiggins

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 1930No. Docket No. 83PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, Acting P. J.

Appellant was and is the owner of approximately 480 acres of land in San Bernardino County. On September 29, 1925, it entered into an executory contract for the sale of this land to Harold Kiggins, the son of E. E. Kiggins, one of the respondents. Two hundred and seventy dollars was paid in cash on account of the purchase price of the property, the balance of which was to be paid in deferred payments, the first falling due on September 29, 1926. The vendee was evidently let into possession of the property. The contract contained the following provision:

“Fourth. That until after all payments…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. DuhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Goulet v. . AsselerNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Brown v. BridgesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  4. Jones v. CortesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Conde v. SweeneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wolfsen v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Miller v. Citizens Sav. & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Smith v. Cap Concrete, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Old Republic Ins. Co. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Avalon Pacific-Santa Ana, L.P. v. HD Supply Repair & Remodel, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API