Legal Opinion
McEachron v. State Farm Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 20, 2004PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMugglin, J.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Benza, J.), entered August 9, 2002 in Albany County, upon a verdict rendered in favor of defendant.
On a prior appeal, we held that Supreme Court correctly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment since a ques*930tion of fact existed concerning the timeliness of the disclaimer of the supplementary underinsured motorist coverage (hereinafter SUM) (295 AD2d 685 [2002]). At trial, after both sides had rested, plaintiff moved for a directed verdict on this issue. Supreme Court reserved decision and submitted the case to the jury. It determined that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- McEachron v. State Farm InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- McNaughton v. MaslynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- Warnke v. Warner-Lambert Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Brown v. DragoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Lawrence v. Capital Care Medical Group, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. HildrethAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Warner v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.