Partee v. Cleveland Trinidad Paving Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Conn Linn, Judge. Action by the Cleveland Trinidad Paving Company against L. P. Pax-tee. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HOOKER, C.
This action was brought by the defendant in ei-ror to foreclose a certain tax bill issued by the city of Tulsa to it, same being designated as special tax bill No. 2190, in street improvement district No. 52-A, and alleged to be a first and prior lien against all that part of lot 1 in block 54 lying westerly of the westerly line of the i*ight of way of the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway in said city.
The answer of the plaintiff in error sets xxp two defenses against this action, namely: (1) That the resolution px-oviding for the improvement in said district and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Chickasha v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- City of Perry v. Davis & YoungerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- City of Muskogee v. RamboSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Norris v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Weaver v. City of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Grier v. McCormickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Woodward v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Rowe v. RoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Colvin v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.