Legal Opinion

Cortez v. Kenneally

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 1996No. B075702PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.

Introduction

Purportedly pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6, 1 the trial court made orders enforcing against defendant and appellant Sharon Kenneally a previous settlement agreement of a medical malpractice action brought by plaintiffs and respondents Miguel Cortez and Graciela de Cortez and the estate of Liliana Cortez, involving alleged malpractice of appellant’s husband, Leo F. Kenneally, M.D. The orders must be reversed, because appellant did not personally participate in the settlement agreement or personally agree to be obligated by it. Under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Murphy v. PadillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Johnson v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. SaundersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Gauss v. GAF Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Burckhard v. Del Monte Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Elnekave v. via Dolce Homeowners Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Account Mgt. Associates v. SanglimsuwanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API