Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Frutiger v. State Ex Rel. Davis

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 13, 1927No. 6 Div. 714PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Action in the nature of quo warranto, brought in the name of the state against respondent (appellant here) for the purpose of excluding him -from the exercise of his profession of treating, or offering to treat, diseases of human beings. Section 9932, subd. 1, Code 1923.

The complaint was sufficient, and the demurrer interposed thereto properly overruled. Donovan v. State (Ala. Sup.) 109 So. 290 ; Cummings v. State, 214 Ala. 209, 106 So. 852; Ex parte Wideman, 213 Ala. 170, 104 So. 440.

Chiropractors are required by law to have a certificate of qualification to treat diseases of human beings.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. LoveIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Harris v. State Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Germany v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Ex Parte WidemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Cummings v. State Ex Rel. BiggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Painless Parker DentistSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  2. McMillan v. State Ex Rel. BiggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Kessler v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API