Legal Opinion

McMillan v. State Ex Rel. Biggs

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 20, 1928No. 1 Div. 497PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

This is a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto, under subdivision 1 of section 9932, Code of 1923, to exclude respondent from unlawfully practicing the profession of dentistry. The proceedings were properly brought, under the direction of the circuit judge, in the name of the state, upon the relation of the solicitor in his official capacity. Donovan v. State, 215 Ala. 55, 109 So. 290; Frutiger v. State, 215 Ala. 451, 111 So. 37; Fraser v. State, 216 Ala. 426, 113 So. 289; Cummings v. State, 214 Ala. 209, 106 So. 852; Robinson v. State, 212 Ala. 459, 102 So. 693.

The first two assignments…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. State Ex Rel. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Cummings v. State Ex Rel. BiggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Donovan v. State Ex Rel. BiggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Fraser v. State Ex Rel. BiggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Folmar v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bass v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Lampkin v. StrawbridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Wilkey v. State Ex Rel. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Dye v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. DicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API