Legal Opinion
Baraglia v. Brilhart
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 30, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The plaintiff, a pedestrian, was struck and injured by a car driven by the defendant. The only assignment of error pursued is the action of the trial court in denying a motion to set aside the verdict made on the ground that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts pertinent to this issue: The plaintiff, fifty-one years of age, left his work in Middletown on March 18, 1946, and was given a- ride to his home at 50 Marlborough Street in Portland. He left the car opposite his home and stood on the south side…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chase v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Kotler v. LalleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Skovronski v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Lutzen v. Henry Jenkins Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Rosen v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Antz v. CoppoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Juchniewicz v. Bridgeport HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Donahue v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadConnecticut Superior Court · 1959
- Perugini v. CassoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Juchniewicz v. Bridgeport HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007