Legal Opinion

Antz v. Coppolo

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 3, 1950PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

This is a negligence action in which the defendant appeals from the denial of his motion to set aside the verdict and from the judgment, claiming that the trial court erred in the charge to the jury. He also assigns error as to the finding.

The finding, including the minor corrections to which the plaintiff is entitled, discloses the conflicting claims of the parties. These were the plaintiff’s claims of proof: On March 17,1947, in midafternoon, she parked her automobile headed north against the easterly curb of Front Street opposite Talmadge Street in New Haven. Front Street runs in a general…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. BeatmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Proto v. Bridgeport Herald CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  3. Lombardi v. WalladSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Cuneo v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Block v. PascucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moriarty v. LippeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Patricia Johnson v. Teamsters Local 559, Patricia Johnson v. Teamsters Local 559Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Lowell v. DalySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  4. Enlund v. BuskeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Danehy v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API