Legal Opinion

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Tennessee Valley Authority

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 12, 1997No. 95-6706PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff below, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (“IAM”), appeals the dismissal of its complaint by the district court, which determined that all of IAM’s federal claims were time barred, and that any state claims were preempted by federal law. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.

I. Facts

On May 9, 1991, the Tennessee Valley Authority (“TVA”) entered into a “Project Maintenance and Modifications Agreement” (“Project Agreement”) with the Tennessee Valley Trades and Labor Council (“Council”), an organization comprised at that time…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. CGM, LLC v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  2. Lowell v. HayesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Thomas v. WilkinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. Kyle Laukus v. Rio Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Lonnie Kimbro v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API