Legal Opinion

Serpas v. Trebucq

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 21, 1941No. 17451PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an application for rehearing counsel for Trebucq raise many points on which they say we are in error, all but one of which, however, we have already discussed.

They complain that we erred "in overruling the decisions of the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the cases of Nunez et al. v. Plaisance [196 La. 926], 200 So. page 302, and Perez v. Hurstell [196 La. 936], 200 So. page 305." Of course we made no abortive effort as such an attempt would have been. In those cases the Supreme Court found that though, in each of the petitions, it had been alleged that the "write in" candidate had been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lacombe v. LabordeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  2. Nunez v. PlaisanceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  3. Perez v. HurstellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  4. Seal v. KnightLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Cox v. MaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API