Legal Opinion

United States v. Classic

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 13, 1941No. 618PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

313 U.S. 299

61 S.Ct. 1031

85 L.Ed. 1368

UNITED STATES

v.

CLASSIC et al.

No. 618.

Argued April 7, 1941.

Decided May 26, 1941.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 13, 1941.

[Syllabus from pages 299-301 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Robert H. Jackson, Atty. Gen., and Herbert Wechsler, of Washington, D.C., for appellant.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 301-303 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Warren O. Coleman, of New Orleans, La., for appellees.

[Argument of Counsel from Pages 304-306 intentionally omitted]

2Opinion of the Court · StoneJustice Stone

1

Two counts of an indictment found in a federal district court charged that appellees, Commissioners of Elections,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited65 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chudacoff v. University Medical Center of Southern NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Public Integrity Alliance, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. (PC) Dillingham v. GarciaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (PS) Gifford v. KampaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. Ireland v. Discover EmployeesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API