Legal Opinion

Nunez v. Plaisance

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 6, 1941No. 35923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PONDER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in a general election contest brought under Act 24 of 1894.

The plaintiff, Andrew Nunez, was the Democratic nominee for the office of Constable of Ward 5 of the Parish of St. Bernard and his was the only name printed on the official ballots for this office in the general election held April 16, 1940. At the general election there were 160 votes cast for Andrew Nunez and 186 votes cast for A. J. Plaisance, the defendant, by the electors writing in the name of A. J. Plaisance in the blank space on the ballots provided for such. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Langridge v. DauenhauerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  2. State Ex Rel. Elston v. Parish Democratic Executive CommitteeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Hinyub v. Parish Democratic Executive CommitteeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  4. Perez v. HurstellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  5. Campo v. AcostaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Serpas v. TrebucqLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Perez v. HurstellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  3. Campo v. AcostaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  4. Serpas v. TrebucqLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Williams v. RaglandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API