Legal Opinion
Coyle v. Duncan Spangler Coal Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 3, 1923No. 9730PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKEEHAN, District Judge.
This is an action of assumpsit, brought by William Radford Coyle, as trustee in bankruptcy of the Tidewater Coal Exchange, against the Duncan Spangler Coal Company, to recover $6,161.40, with interest, for coal loaned or advanced by the bankrupt to or for the account of the defendant. The statement of claim avers that the defendant is a citizen of Pennsylvania and that the amount in controversy exceeds $3,000. Nowhere in the pleadings is there any averment regarding the citizenship of. either the plaintiff or the bankrupt. As to this, the plaintiff merely avers that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Louisville Trust Co. v. ComingorSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Thomas v. Board of Trustees of the Ohio State UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Lathrop v. DrakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schumacher v. BeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Williams v. AustrianSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Central Republic Bank & Trust Co. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- McCahan's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Matthew v. CoppinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.