Legal Opinion

Arline v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 16, 1986No. 09 83 199 CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIES, Chief Justice.

In a published opinion, 690 S.W.2d 20, this Court reversed and remanded this case because the trial court, after timely objection, failed to define “Reasonable belief” in accordance with TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. sec. 1.07(a)(31) (Vernon 1974). After the State’s petition for discretionary review, the Court of Criminal Appeals remanded the cause to this Court to reconsider the appellant’s ground of error in the light of Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157 (Tex.Crim.App.1985).1

While both Almanza and our case involve challenges to the court’s charge, there is no reason to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Howard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1986
  3. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API