Legal Opinion

Kniskern v. Melkonian

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 13, 2007No. 06-P-552PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKafker, J.

The issues presented in the instant case concern the scope of G. L. c. 152, § 23, the exclusivity provision in the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act). After injuring his shoulder, the plaintiff, Leonard Kniskem, negotiated a workers’ compensa*462tian lump sum settlement agreement. The agreement included language that purported to reserve his right to pursue a pending tort claim against the same insured party for the same injury. When the defendant, Kevin Melkonian, doing business as M & M Contractors (Melkonian) — the employer in the workers’ compensation case — did not file an answer in the tort…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Berger v. H.P. Hood, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Longever v. Revere Copper & Brass Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Owens v. MukendiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. Lee v. International Data GroupMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  5. McCracken v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wentworth v. HENRY C. BECKER CUSTOM BUILDING LTD.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. JOHN J. SULLIVAN v. SUPERINTENDENT, MASSACHUSETTS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, SHIRLEY, & others.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
  3. Pajak v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  4. Faria v. Portuguese Am. Civil League of LowellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  5. Callender v. CSH Realty Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API