Legal Opinion

Adams v. Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hinman, J.:

Claimant was employed as a laborer at the plant of his employer. At eleven-thirty on the morning of his accident the claimant and about fifteen others were laid off because of some unforeseen event which made it unnecessary for the employer to make use of those men any longer on that day. Some of the other employees at the plant finished out a full day. The workmen were allowed to eat their lunch on the premises and the claimant did eat his lunch although the record does not disclose just when he did so. Notwithstanding the fact that he had been laid off at eleven-thirty a. m., It…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Claim of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. McInerney v. Buffalo & Susquehanna RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Claim of Sexton v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. Matter of Hogan v. . Edward Engineering CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Great American Indemnity Co. v. BrittonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960
  3. Claim of Piekut v. FleischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
  4. Hearsing v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Higgins v. Oppenheim, Collins & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API