Claim of Sexton v. Public Service Commission
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, The City of New York, from an award of the State Industrial Commission, made on the 26th day of December, 1916.
1Opinion of the Court
Kellogg, P. J.:
The claimant was supervising the construction of a part of the subway in New York city, which work was being performed by Booth & Flinn, Limited, contractors. His work was principally in the tunnel of the subway, except at the end of the month, when he worked on estimates. He was directed by the engineer in charge to survey all the supports under the railroad tracks, underneath the decking in the subway, at Whitehall and Stone streets, and while so engaged on July 14, 1916, he became very dirty and his clothes became covered with dirt and filth, which necessitated their being…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Murdoch v. Humes SwanstromIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- Associated Employers' Reciprocal v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Ray v. School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
- Adams v. Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Claim of Muller v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.