Legal Opinion
Claim of Piekut v. Fleischer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 3, 1950Published
1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.
We are met, first of all, with a contention by the Workmen’s Compensation Board that its decision is interlocutory and not appealable. The effect of appeals from intermediate decisions of the board has been considered several times and in several aspects, but there remains some open and debatable ground and this case is on that ground.
The Referee after a hearing dismissed the claim. On a review of the Referee’s decision the board reversed the Referee, restored the case to the Referee’s calendar for consideration of disability “ and a suitable award to be made.” The board panel which made the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Claim of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Claim of Gifford v. T. G. Patterson, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Claim of Sparone v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Claim of Brown v. New York State Training School for GirlsNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Adams v. Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.