Legal Opinion

Lane v. Pferdner

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,448PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, in the First District Court, County of San Luis Obisbo. Fawcett, J.

1Opinion of the Court

McKinstry, J.:

The jurisdiction of the District Court, under the late Constitution, to try and determine a contest arising in the surveyor-*123general’s office, was special, and depended upon the fact that the Surveyor-General had made an order “ referring the contest.” It was necessary, therefore, when an action was brought to try the rights of the contestants to purchase the lands, for the plaintiff to allege and prove (by the production of the certified copy of the entry) that the surveyor-general made the order of reference. (Pol. Code, §§ 3414, 3415 ; Berry v. Cammet, 44 Cal. 347.) The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cadierque v. DuranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Berry v. CammetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Garfield v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Gilson v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Prentice v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Polk v. SleeperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Bieber v. LambertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API