Hemingway v. Ball
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
This matter is before the court upon the return of an order to show cause why the defendant should not be enjoined, pendentelite, from prosecuting an action at law in the Essex county circuit court against the complainant Walter C. Hemingway. On the return of the order to show cause, the defendant moved to strike the bill on the ground, among others, that the alleged contract set forth in the bill of complaint, and upon which complainants' right of action rests, is void both at law and in equity and contrary to public policy.
The facts appearing from the bill of complaint, and which for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Maisch v. MaischSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Dennison v. DennisonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Stokes v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Ellicott v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1884
- Dennison v. DennisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Girard Trust Co. v. SchmitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- Wolff v. WolffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Phillips v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937
- Woodhouse v. WoodhouseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Ferrante v. PhilpottNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948