Ellicott v. Chamberlin
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree of the chancellor, whose opinion is reported in Ellicott v. Chamberlin, 10 Stew. Eq. 470.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, J.
Elisha Warford executed his will on the 1st day of November, 1862. By the residuary clause he gave to the appellant (who was his only child) all the residue of his estate, both real and personal, to her sole and separate use, to keep the lands devised to her, or have them sold by the executors named in his will, as she saw fit. The persons named therein as executors were George A. Allen and Amplius B. Chamberlin.
*606On the 4th day of February, 1868, Mr. Warford executed a codicil tó his will, by which he appointed Holcombe Warford as executor in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Porter v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Manning v. ManningNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
- Setter v. AlveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Forbes v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ryan v. Motor Credit Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- Gluck v. Rynda Development Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Blaine v. KrysowatyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
- Downs v. Jersey Central Power, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. SternNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.