Legal Opinion · Dissent

Galloway v. Fletcher

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided August 31, 2007No. 2006-CA-002428-MRPublished

1DissentWine, Judge

Respectfully, I dissent. The dictates of KRS 164.005(5) are not ambiguous and clearly outline the responsibilities of the parties. It is also important to note that the constitutionality of KRS 164.005(5)(a) or (b) has not been challenged under §§27 or 28 of the Kentucky Constitution. KRS 164.005(5) deals specifically with a vacancy on the Board of Regents of certain Kentucky universities including Murray State University. The nominating committee shall submit three nominations to the Governor for each vacancy. KRS 164.005(5)(a). “The Governor shall select the appointees from among the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meyers v. Chapman Printing Co., Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Parts Depot, Inc. v. BeiswengerKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Morton v. Auburndale Realty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  4. Oppenheimer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  5. Shannon, State Auditor v. Burke, County Tax Com'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API