Legal Opinion

Oppenheimer v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided April 25, 1947PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Affirming.

The question is the liability of the purchaser of the assets and business of a company which was subject to the terms of the Kentucky Unemployment Compensation Law for its delinquent taxes or contributions. Ch. 341, Ky. Rev. Stats.

The appellant; M. S. Oppenheimer, purchased all the assets of Do Nut Restaurant No. 2, Incorporated, and they were transferred to him on June 30, 1944. He continued to operate the business in the same place, with substantially the same employees. By reason thereof he became a “subject employer.” KRS 341.250,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southern Photo & Blue Print Co. v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Louisville Title Mortgage Co. v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Unemployment Compensation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  2. Midwest Mutual Insurance Co. v. WiremanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  3. Morton v. Auburndale Realty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  4. Dep't of Revenue v. Revelation Energy, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2018
  5. Wildot, Inc. v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API