Legal Opinion

Sheptow v. Geico General Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 2011No. 09CV0041MA; A144862PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

The issue in this case is whether a motor vehicle liability insurance policy issued for delivery in Oregon must, subject to exceptions not applicable here, provide Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage to all persons who use an insured motor vehicle with the consent of the named insured. Defendant insurer appeals from a general judgment that was based on the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, a permissive user under a liability policy that defendant issued to the named insured, in which the court answered that question in the affirmative. On appeal,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Herman v. Valley InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Mid-Century Insurance v. Utah Home Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gary v. Geico Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Ma v. Geico Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Radix Law PLC v. MullenDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API