State v. . Steen
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS and CLARKSON, J. J., concurring; HOKE and STACY, J. J., dissenting, STACY, J., writing the dissenting opinion.(768) The defendant was convicted upon two bills of indictment charging sales of liquor to one Harry Sapphire. It appears from the evidence that conditions as to "bootlegging" in that town and county were such that the good citizens of the town of Rockingham organized a club to secure the enforcement of laws, among them W. N. Everett, now Secretary of State, and Walter L. Parsons, formerly a Senator, and other prominent and well known citizens of the State, as appears from the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . GeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- State v. . BittingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. . Harvey PerkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- State v. SmoakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. StegmannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. . BittingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.