Legal Opinion

ANTONIAK v. ARMSTRONG

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01263Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GEORGE ANTONIAK, et al. : : v. : : CIVIL ACTION MARTIN ARMSTRONG, : : v. : NO. 18-1263 : HERITAGE NUMISMATIC AUCTIONS, : INC. : MEMORANDUM Bartle, J. May 19, 2020 Plaintiffs George Antoniak, Andrew Antoniak, and I. Switt (collectively, the “Antoniaks”) brought this diversity action against defendant Martin Armstrong (“Armstrong”) for a declaratory judgment under

28 U.S.C. § 2201

that they and not Armstrong own a collection of 58 ancient coins. Armstrong joined Heritage Numismatic Auctions, Inc. (“Heritage”) as a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. HaegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Ford v. Temple HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API