Legal Opinion

Riddle v. DynCorp International Inc.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 19, 2010No. 4:10-cv-00546PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SAM A. LINDSAY, District Judge.

Before this court is Defendants DynCorp International Inc., Aiman K. Zureikat and Richard C. Cashon’s Motion to Dismiss, filed May 27, 2010. After reviewing the motion, response, reply, and applicable law, the court grants Defendant DynCorp International Inc., Aiman K. Zureikat and Richard C. Cashon’s Motion to Dismiss.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Plaintiff Michael Riddle (“Riddle” or “Plaintiff’) filed this action against Defendants DynCorp International Inc., Mark Ray, Aiman K. Zureikat and Richard C. Cashon (collectively,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pezza v. Investors Capital Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  2. United States ex rel. Berglund v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2011
  3. Merritt v. Mountain Laurel Chalets, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2015
  4. Riddle v. Dyncorp International Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
  5. Saunders v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API