Legal Opinion

Toliver v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2012No. S-14232PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Senior Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal presents the question whether the Alaska State Commission for Human Rights (the Commission) must interview one or more witnesses identified by a complainant before dismissing a complaint for lack of substantial evidence to support a discrimination claim. We conclude that the statutory duty to impartially investigate implies that the Commission must make a reasonable effort to interview at least some of the witnesses identified by a complainant where it appears that they may have relevant information. We also conclude that this duty…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Loomis Electronics Protection, Inc. v. SchaeferAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Alaskans for Efficient Government, Inc. v. KnowlesAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Elaine G. Parker v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  5. State, Department of Fish & Game, Sport Fish Division v. MeyerAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MitchellAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Wright v. AndingAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Richard Barton DeRemer III v. Craig Turnbull and Brian MorrisAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Mallory D. v. Malcolm D.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API