Legal Opinion

Camposano v. Claiborn

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 17, 1963No. File No. CV 6-613-1304PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

As the defendant states in his brief, “the verdict having been rendered on conflicting evidence, the sole issue raised by the defendant’s motion is whether the action was barred by the Statute of Limitations governing malpractice (Sec. 52-584) or the three year statute of limitations governing oral contracts (See. 52-581).”

After the claim of fraud or misrepresentation had been removed from the case by a ruling of the court, the sole remaining claim on behalf of the plaintiff was a claim based upon an alleged contract by the defendant doctor whereby he assured or warranted that a specific…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  2. Perlstein v. Westport Sanitarium Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1942

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Barnes v. SchleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Haase v. StarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Trimel v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital Rehabilitation CenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Peterson v. HartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re Cendant Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API