Legal Opinion
Trimel v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital Rehabilitation Center
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 16, 2001No. AC 19675PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Gloria Trimel, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after it granted the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants, Lawrence and Memorial Hospital Rehabilitation Center (Lawrence and Memorial) and Flanders Health Center (Flanders). On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly granted the motion because the court incorrectly characterized her claim as sounding in medical malpractice rather than in ordinary negligence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to our discussion of this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barrett v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- LeConche v. ElligersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Levett v. EtkindSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Camposano v. ClaibornConnecticut Appellate Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Gold v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Dubreuil v. WittConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Trimel v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital Rehabilitation CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Vona v. LernerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Gallinari v. KlothDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.