Middlebrooks v. Cabaniss
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
“A new promise, in order to renew a right of action already barred, or to constitute a point from which the limitation shall commence running on a right of action not yet barred, shall be in writing, either in the party’s own handwriting, or subscribed by him or some one authorized by him.” Code, § 3-901. An acknowledgment in writing of the existing liability is equivalent to a new promise to pay. Harrell v. Davis, 108 Ga. 789 (2) (33 S. E. 852); Sammons v. Naders, 186 Ga. 161, 164 (197 S. E. 284); Code, § 3-903. Such a writing containing a promise or acknowledgment, in order…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- First National Bank in Canyon v. GambleTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Searles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Martin v. BroachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
- Clunin v. First Federal Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Hines v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Peppers v. SieffermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- SKC, Inc. v. eMag Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Loftin v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Garrett v. Lincoln Cemetery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Bickers v. PinnellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.